Carnicom’s work contradicts most of what Tony claims is beneficial. Carnicom’s work is light years ahead of anyone else’s. Decide for yourself based on verifiable scientific evidence would be my recommendation. Anyone can make legitimate sounding claims but I do not know of anyone besides Clifford and now Ana Mihalcea that are doing real scientific work in this area.
Carnicom’s work contradicts most of what Tony claims is beneficial. Carnicom’s work is light years ahead of anyone else’s. Decide for yourself based on verifiable scientific evidence would be my recommendation. Anyone can make legitimate sounding claims but I do not know of anyone besides Clifford and now Ana Mihalcea that are doing real scientific work in this area.
I think the thousands of anecdotal reports from people following Tony's work speak for themselves. People get results with his methods. But I also respect Cliff's work. I am not "either/or" minded -- I'm "both/and" minded. My approach is to integrate rather than "choose a side," because that's how I think the best knowledge is gained.
What are the other ways, besides paracetic acid, where Tony's and Cliff's work are contradictory?
Tony sells a device called an anti nano triangle which introduces and electrical current to the human body. Clifford’s paper on Blood alterations III: Transformation clearly indicates that electrical current applied to the body/ blood even at extremely low levels, single digit milliamps can catastrophic damage to the blood and dramatically increases the CDB’s growth rate.
The Triangle introduces a magnetic pulse to the body -- that's different than introducing an electrical current. And the proof is in the pudding -- a lot of people have fantastic results from the Triangle.
Carnicom’s work contradicts most of what Tony claims is beneficial. Carnicom’s work is light years ahead of anyone else’s. Decide for yourself based on verifiable scientific evidence would be my recommendation. Anyone can make legitimate sounding claims but I do not know of anyone besides Clifford and now Ana Mihalcea that are doing real scientific work in this area.
I think the thousands of anecdotal reports from people following Tony's work speak for themselves. People get results with his methods. But I also respect Cliff's work. I am not "either/or" minded -- I'm "both/and" minded. My approach is to integrate rather than "choose a side," because that's how I think the best knowledge is gained.
What are the other ways, besides paracetic acid, where Tony's and Cliff's work are contradictory?
Tony sells a device called an anti nano triangle which introduces and electrical current to the human body. Clifford’s paper on Blood alterations III: Transformation clearly indicates that electrical current applied to the body/ blood even at extremely low levels, single digit milliamps can catastrophic damage to the blood and dramatically increases the CDB’s growth rate.
The Triangle introduces a magnetic pulse to the body -- that's different than introducing an electrical current. And the proof is in the pudding -- a lot of people have fantastic results from the Triangle.